EU Core Home

Framework for an
Emotionally Intelligent Alternative Society

Below is a framework I am developing. - S. P. Hein

Under construction December, 2012

Alternative Justice System

Understanding, Helping vs Punishing

"Understanders" vs Judges

Safe to Tell the Truth

Seeking Understanding vs Seeking Guilt

Consideration of Feelings, Emotional Needs

Consideration of Love, Caring, Forgiveness

No "Accused," "Defense," or "Prosecution"

No Age Discrimination

Third Alternative, Restorative Justice,

Alternative Education System

Education about Emotional Needs

Emotional Literacy

Emotionally Intelligent Communication

Meets Emotional Needs of Children and Teens

Education about Emotional Cause and Effect

Education about Invalidation, Emotional Abuse

Education about Dangers of Mind Control

Cooperation vs Competition

Alternative Economic System

Based on concept of "Caringism"

Caring about People vs Caring about Money

Social Expenses Paid Voluntarily

Decentralized vs Centralized

Alternative Belief System

Based on Nature

Healthy / Unhealthy vs Good / Evil; Right/ Wrong

Unity, Humanity vs Patriotism, Division

Security Through Mutual Respect, Friendship

Equality vs Authority, Hierarchy

Focus on Needs vs on "Rights"


Core Components

Respect | Empathy
Caring | Listening
Understanding


 
Needs vs Rights

Very briefly, it seems to make more sense to talk about needs than rights. Our needs seem to come from nature and are therefore closer to nature. Our "rights," on the other hand seem to come from other humans.

For for example, let's say you are in jail, how do you know what your rights are? Probably you would have to be told what they are. Or you would have to consult a lawyer or law books.

But how would you know what your needs are? I suggest that it would be your own body which tells you.

Thus, your needs are individual, personal.

Your "rights" though, would be the same as someone else in prison, again according to what someone else had decided.

Many cultures promote the concept of "equal rights." A problem though, is that our needs are not equal. And of course the "rights" of someone in jail are not the same as the rights of someone who is not in jail, so no society really practices the ideal of equal rights.

Focusing on needs, then, helps us reach our goal of a society where people's individual needs are addressed and filled.

 

 
Another Problem with Concept of Rights

You can take away rights. In some countries, such as the USA, important legal documents, such as the Declaration of Independence of the USA, states that rights are "unalienable". In other words, they can't be taken away. But we simply have to consider a prisoner to realize that rights can be taken away.

Needs on the other hand, are filled, not given, granted, taken away. You can take away a person's right to something, but not his or her need for it.